Offside rule: the assistant referee's condemnation
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: in this article, a model is developed that includes the main elements of a typical game situation in which the assistant referee must judge a possible offside. In this conceptual framework, the assumption is incorporated that the assistant makes a change of gaze and can only evaluate the relative position of the attacker with respect to the penultimate opponent thousandths of seconds after the pass.
Objective: to identify the determinants of the degree of difficulty that exists in making a correct ruling in which the assistant referee must judge a possible offside.
Material and methods: analytical-synthetic and systemic structural-functional methods were used as theoretical methods of scientific research. Of the empirical ones, documentary analysis and expert judgment, as well as statistical methods (Hypothesis testing.
Results: it is shown that in most cases he must make a decision at the moment when the distortion derived from this fact reaches its maximum expression.
Conclusions: the estimates made for different situations allow the model's derivations to be verified and quantified.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
As part of the submission process, authors are required to indicate that their submission meets all of the elements listed below, and to be aware that submissions that do not meet these guidelines may be returned to the author.
Declaration of authorship and originality
The author who sends the submission to Science and Sports, certifies:
- That each of the people listed as author has contributed directly to the intellectual content of the work, approves the contents of the manuscript that is submitted to the editorial process and gives their consent for their name to appear in its authorship.
- That the petition has not been previously published, is not under review in another journal, nor does it appear in another work accepted for publication by another publisher.
- That in the event that the content has been presented in a communication or congress, the current petition represents a substantial modification of it and the text on which it is based has been properly cited. An explanation of this circumstance is provided to the publisher in the appropriate place on the submission form ("Comments to the editor" box).
- That each of the people listed as author agrees not to submit this work for consideration by another publication while it is in the editorial process in Science and Sports.
- That the contribution of those people who, not being signatories of the same nor responsible for the final version, have contributed substantially to the development of the work and have granted their permission for such has been recognized in a note of the article, as a way of gratitude. mention.
- That the data and publications on which the information contained in the work is based, or that have had a relevant influence on it, have been cited in the text and in the list of bibliographic references, taking responsibility, in terms of rights. copyright refers to any litigation or claim related to intellectual property rights, exonerating Ciencia y Deporte from liability.
Likewise, the author who submits the work must confirm compliance with the following points:
- The text meets the bibliographic and style requirements indicated.
- If the text has been assigned to a section of the journal subject to peer review ( see section policy ).
- The file sent is in DOC or DOCX format.
- Where possible, web addresses and DOI have been added to references.
Copyright notice
The authors who publish in Science and Sports agree to the following terms:
- The authors retain the copyright, guaranteeing Ciencia y Deporte the right to the first publication of the work that they send to the magazine so that it can be submitted to the editorial process.
- The authors are aware that their work is published under a CreativeCommons (CC) 4.0 License. (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share it with an acknowledgment of the authorship of the work and its initial publication in this journal.
- The authors of Science and Sports have the rights to exploit the work that has been published in this magazine, authorizing its Publisher to exercise free reproduction, distribution and public communication for non-commercial purposes.
- The authors know that their work will be stored on servers and reproduced in digital format for incorporation into institutional repositories and databases that will facilitate free access to the full text of the work.
- Authors may distribute the version of the work published in Ciencia y Deporte immediately after the release of each issue (for example, place it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with express recognition of its initial publication in Ciencia and Sport.
References
Baldo, M.V.C., Morya, E. & Ranvaud, R.D. (2002). Flag Errors in Soccer Games: The Flash-Lag Effect Brought to Real Life. Perception, 31, 1205-1210. http://fisio2.icb.usp.br:4888/~vinicius/publications/Baldo_Ranvaud_Morya%202002%20.pdf
Belda Maruenda, F. (2004). Can the human eye detect an offside position during a football match? British Medical Journal, 329, 1470-1472. https://www.bmj.com/content/329/7480/1470
Carosi, J. (2010). The history of offside. http://www.kenaston.org/download/KenAstonRefereeSociety/offside_history-JulianCarosi.pdf
Catteeuw, P., Gilis, B., Helsen, W. & Wagemans, J. (2010). Offside decision making of assistant referees in the English Premier League: Impact of physical and perceptual-cognitive factors on match performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28(5), 471-481. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/43343901_Offside_decision_making_of_assistant_referees_in_the_English_Premier_League_Impact_of_physical_and_perceptual -cognitive_factors_on_match_performance
Clark, R. (2016). Revising FIFA´s Laws of the Game. Law Student Papers, Duquesne University. https://dsc.duq.edu/law-student-papers/7/
Helsen, W., Gilis, B. & Weston, M. (2007). Helsen, Gilis, and Weston (2006) do not err in questioning the optical error hypothesis as the only major account for explaining offside decision-making errors. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(9), 991-994. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6335394_Helsen_Gilis_and_Weston_2006_do_not_err_in_questioning_the_optical_error_hypothesis_as_the_only_major_account_for_explaining_offside_decision-making_errors
Helsen, W., Gilis, B. & Weston, M. (2006). Errors in judging "offside" in association football: Test of the optical error versus the perceptual flash-lag hypothesis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(5), 5211-528. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7170934_Errors_in_judging_offside_in_association_football_Test_of_the_optical_error_versus_the_perceptual_flash -lag_hypothesis
Hüttermann, S., Noël, B. & Memmert, D. (2017). Evaluating erroneous offside calls in soccer. Plos One, 12(3). https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0174358
International Football Association Board (2023). Reglas de Juego 23/24. IFAB. https://www.theifab.com/documents/?documentType=all&language=en&years=2023
International Football Association Board (2018). Circular No 12. Important information about Video Assistant Referees (VAR).https://downloads.theifab.com/downloads/circular-12_en?l=en
Kalnin, R.A. (1973). Álgebra y funciones elementales. Mir. https://elsolucionario.net/algebra-funciones-elementales-r-kalnin-1ra-edicion/
Mallo, J., Gonzalez Frutos, P., Juárez, D. & Navarro, E. (2012). Effect of positioning on the accuracy of decision making of association football top-class referees and assistant referees during competitive matches. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30(13), 1437-1445. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/148664622.pdf
Oudejans, R.R., Bakker, F.C. & Beek, P. J. (2007). Helsen, Gilis and Weston (2006) err in testing the optical error hypothesis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25(9), 987-990. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6335393_Helsen_Gilis_and_Weston_2006_err_in_testing_the_optical_error_hypothesis
Oudejans, R.R., Bakker, F.C., Verheijen, R., Gerrits, J.C., Steinbrückner, M. & Beek, P. J. (2005). How position and motion of expert assistant referees in soccer relate to the quality of their offside judgements during actual match play. International of Sport Psychology, 36, 3-21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232596432_How_position_and_motion_of_expert_assistant_referees_in_soccer_relate_to_the_quality_of_their_offside_judgements_during_actual_match
Oudejans, R.R., Verheijen, R., Bakker, F.C., Gerrits, J.C., Steinbrückner, M. & Beek, P. J. (2000). Errors in judging `offside' in football. Nature, 404, 33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/12600290_Errors_in_judging_'offside'_in_football
Sanabria, J., Cenjor, C., Márquez, F., Gutierrez, R., Martinez, D. & Prados-García, J.L. (1998). Oculomotor movements and football's Law 11. The Lancet, 351, 268. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(05)78269-6/abstract
Woods, F. S. & Bailey, F. H. (1944). Analytic geometry and calculus. Athenaeum Press.
Wühr, P. , Fasold, F. & Memmert, D. (2020). The impact of team preferences on soccer offside judgments in laypersons: a quasi-experimental study. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5, 1-24. https://cognitiveresearchjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41235-020-00253 -2
Wühr, P. , Fasold, F. & Memmert, D. (2015). Soccer Offside Judgments in Laypersons with Different Types of Static Displays. Plos One, 10(8). https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0133687